A difficult healthcare search does not always begin with a difficult candidate market. Sometimes the problem starts with the position itself.

Before we begin sourcing for a healthcare role, we need to understand whether the employer's expectations match the market we will actually be recruiting from. That means looking at compensation, experience requirements, geography, schedule, work arrangement and the qualifications that have been designated as mandatory. If those pieces do not fit together, finding more candidates rarely fixes the problem.

Every additional requirement affects the available candidate pool. An employer may reasonably want five or ten years of experience, knowledge of a particular system, experience in the same healthcare setting and someone who already lives within commuting distance. Add an onsite requirement and compensation that has not been tested against the current market, and a seemingly broad healthcare search can become very narrow.

Recent recruiting research illustrates how candidates are evaluating opportunities. iHire's 2026 State of Online Recruiting report found that 75.4% of job seekers expect salary ranges in job advertisements, 56.3% expect employers to identify whether a position is onsite, remote or hybrid, and 53.1% want required qualifications separated from preferred qualifications. More than a third, 35.4%, said too many candidate "must-haves" would make them less interested in applying.

Healthcare employers can see an even greater impact when they narrow a search around experience. Acuvance Coker's 2026 Advanced Practice Provider Strategy & Oversight Survey found that only 7% of participating organizations reported difficulty recruiting early-career APPs, compared with 69% reporting difficulty recruiting experienced APPs.

That does not mean employers should lower their standards to make a search easier. Some experience and qualifications are essential. The more useful question is whether each requirement reflects what someone actually needs to succeed in the position or has simply become part of the job specification over time.

This is where healthcare recruiting should provide more than candidate sourcing.

Before launching a search, we want to understand how large the realistic candidate market is, whether the compensation fits the experience being requested, what will make passive candidates consider leaving their current employer and where the search is likely to encounter resistance. If the market tells us that the combination of compensation, experience, location and work requirements is going to make the search unusually difficult, that is useful information before months are spent recruiting against it.

The hiring process matters as well. An employer can have a well-defined position and competitive compensation and still lose qualified candidates because too much time passes between interviews or an offer takes too long to approve. Medical Economics reported this year that healthcare candidates can be lost between recruiter screens and hiring manager interviews and during delayed offer approvals. The problem is not always finding someone. Sometimes it is what happens after you find them.

There are certainly healthcare positions where candidate supply really is the problem. Some specialties have limited pools, certain locations are harder to recruit into, and senior or highly specialized positions can take considerable time to fill. The Association for Advancing Physician and Provider Recruitment reported in September that physician searches took a median of 119 days in 2025, with endocrinology searches taking a median of 321 days and oncology 244 days.

Those benchmarks are useful, but they do not tell an employer whether its particular search has been constructed correctly.

The purpose of evaluating a search before sourcing begins is not to make every position easier to fill. It is to understand what the market will realistically support and build the recruiting strategy around that information.

At AlediumHR, that assessment is part of the healthcare recruiting process. Finding candidates matters, but so does understanding the market those candidates are coming from. When the search is calibrated correctly at the beginning, sourcing has a much better chance of producing candidates the employer actually wants to hire.

Sources & Further Reading